< Finsweet Attributes >
Tax deductions, credits, and amortization

What are common mistakes to avoid when filing for IRS Section 179?

Last updated: 
Sep 2025
Blue J Answer
Blue J leverages the latest large language models and a vast and authoritative tax database to answer tax questions. The information provided does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Generative AI systems can make mistakes. Verify all important information.
Better Tax Answers For All Your Tax Questions

Ask Blue J any tax question, then go deeper. Follow up, add client-specific context, and explore the sources behind every answer with Blue J’s generative AI solution for tax research.

Table of Contents
Answer

When filing for the IRS Section 179 deduction, there are several common mistakes that taxpayers—especially small businesses and farmers—should avoid to ensure compliance and maximize their allowable deduction. Below is a comprehensive analysis of these pitfalls, with references to the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations, and relevant IRS guidance.

1. Claiming Ineligible Property

Mistake: Attempting to expense property that does not qualify under Section 179.

  • Section 179 property must be tangible personal property (not real property), certain computer software, or qualified real property (such as qualified improvement property and certain improvements to nonresidential real property) that is acquired by purchase for use in the active conduct of a trade or business.
  • Land and land improvements (e.g., swimming pools, paved parking areas, fences not used for agricultural purposes) do not qualify.
  • Property acquired by gift or inheritance is not eligible.
  • Property acquired from related parties (spouse, ancestors, lineal descendants) is not eligible.

2. Exceeding Dollar and Investment Limits

Mistake: Failing to apply the annual dollar limit and phase-out threshold.

  • For 2025, the maximum Section 179 deduction is $1,250,000, reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount by which the cost of Section 179 property placed in service exceeds $3,130,000.
  • If the cost of Section 179 property placed in service during the year is $4,380,000 or more, no Section 179 deduction is allowed.
  • For SUVs, a separate, lower limit applies: $31,300 for 2025.

3. Ignoring the Business Income Limitation

Mistake: Deducting more than the taxable income from the active conduct of a trade or business.

  • The Section 179 deduction cannot exceed the aggregate amount of taxable income derived from the active conduct of any trade or business during the year.
  • Any amount disallowed due to this limitation can be carried forward indefinitely.

4. Failing to Apply the Correct Order of Deductions

Mistake: Not applying Section 179 before bonus depreciation and regular MACRS depreciation.

  • Section 179 must be applied first, followed by bonus depreciation (if elected), and then regular MACRS depreciation on any remaining basis.

5. Not Meeting the “More Than 50% Business Use” Requirement

Mistake: Claiming Section 179 on property not used more than 50% for business in the year placed in service.

  • If business use drops to 50% or less in any year during the recovery period, a recapture of the deduction is required.

6. Improper Allocation Among Multiple Businesses or Spouses

Mistake: Not properly allocating the Section 179 limit among multiple businesses or between spouses filing separately.

  • The dollar limit applies to the taxpayer, not to each business. If married filing separately, the limit must be allocated between spouses unless they elect a different allocation.

7. Incorrect Basis Calculation

Mistake: Failing to reduce the basis of property by the Section 179 deduction before calculating depreciation.

  • The basis for depreciation must be reduced by the amount of Section 179 expensed.

8. Not Properly Electing or Revoking the Deduction

Mistake: Not making the election on a timely filed return or not following the correct procedure to revoke or amend the election.

  • The election must specify the property and amount and be made on the original or an amended return filed within the time prescribed by law.
  • Revocation of the election (or any specification) can be made on an amended return within the prescribed time, but once revoked, it is irrevocable.

9. Failing to Recapture the Deduction When Required

Mistake: Not recapturing the Section 179 deduction if business use drops to 50% or less during the recovery period.

  • The recapture amount must be included as ordinary income in the year the business use drops.

10. Inadequate Recordkeeping

Mistake: Not maintaining adequate records to substantiate the Section 179 deduction.

  • Taxpayers must keep records showing the specific identification of each piece of qualifying property, how it was acquired, from whom, and when it was placed in service.

11. Claiming Section 179 for Leased Property (Noncorporate Lessors)

Mistake: Noncorporate lessors claiming Section 179 on property leased to others without meeting the special requirements.

  • Noncorporate lessors generally cannot claim Section 179 unless the property was manufactured or produced by the lessor, or the lease term is less than 50% of the class life and certain other requirements are met.

12. Not Adjusting for Like-Kind Exchanges and Trade-Ins

Mistake: Claiming Section 179 on the full cost of property acquired in a like-kind exchange or trade-in.

  • Only the excess basis (cash paid or boot) is eligible for Section 179; the carryover basis is not.

13. Summary Table of Key Section 179 Mistakes to Avoid:

  1. Expensing ineligible property (e.g., land, inherited/gifted assets, property from related parties).
  2. Exceeding annual dollar and investment limits.
  3. Ignoring the business income limitation.
  4. Applying deductions in the wrong order.
  5. Failing the >50% business use test.
  6. Improper allocation among businesses or spouses.
  7. Incorrect basis calculation for depreciation.
  8. Not properly electing or revoking the deduction.
  9. Failing to recapture when business use drops.
  10. Inadequate recordkeeping.
  11. Improper claims by noncorporate lessors.
  12. Not adjusting for like-kind exchanges/trade-ins.

By carefully following the requirements in Section 179 and related IRS guidance, and by avoiding these common mistakes, taxpayers can maximize their deduction and reduce the risk of IRS challenge or recapture.

Table of Contents

Was this answer helpful?

Go beyond the search box and discover how Blue J makes tax research as quick and easy as asking a colleague.

What Tax Professionals Are Saying

"Blue J is already delivering great results. We are excited to partner with Blue J on this initiative."

Sarah Chen
Senior Tax Manager
Regional Accounting Firm
$37,000+ in tax savings found

“Blue J will expand our generative AI capabilities to give our team members access to high-quality, quickly accessible data and effective research tooling, which, when coupled with their own personal expertise and experience, will unlock new insights with seamless efficiency. Our teams will tap Ask Blue J to discover the best tax law and insights to apply to their clients' individual situations, and in so doing, will enhance their own expertise. We view this collaboration as a win for both our clients and our people."

Sarah Chen
Senior Tax Manager
Regional Accounting Firm
$37,000+ in tax savings found

What Blue J customers are saying

Darin K. Seal

“We are excited to use Blue J to elevate the initial work product our team is able to produce."

"We’re incorporating Blue J to ensure our people are well-equipped with a research tool that delivers on both ease of use and quality of deliverable. It will save us a lot of time as a starting point, so we can focus our efforts on the analysis. Ultimately, it helps us get to the right answer, faster.”

"We’re incorporating Blue J to ensure our people are well-equipped with a research tool that delivers on both ease of use and quality of deliverable. It will save us a lot of time as a starting point, so we can focus our efforts on the analysis. Ultimately, it helps us get to the right answer, faster.”

Read More
Darin K. Seal, Partner In Charge of the Tax Department
HMV CPAs
Matt Mueller

"We had used Checkpoint for a long time but found it wasn’t particularly well-used in our practice."

"A lot of our practitioners would have to turn to Google to find what they were looking for, which of course isn’t ideal. Blue J is a real game-changer when it comes to this, since it combines the efficiency of Google with the authoritative tax materials our people really need to serve their clients best. At ELO, we pride ourselves on providing services that are focused on value for clients and exceeding their expectations. Adding Blue J to our toolbox will enable us to do just that, as we continue to evolve our service offerings to better serve our clients’ needs.”

"A lot of our practitioners would have to turn to Google to find what they were looking for, which of course isn’t ideal. Blue J is a real game-changer when it comes to this, since it combines the efficiency of Google with the authoritative tax materials our people really need to serve their clients best. At ELO, we pride ourselves on providing services that are focused on value for clients and exceeding their expectations. Adding Blue J to our toolbox will enable us to do just that, as we continue to evolve our service offerings to better serve our clients’ needs.”

Read More
Matt Mueller, Partner and Tax Practice Leader
ELO CPAs
David L. Phelps

"We find this tool to be a game-changer for us and our clients.”

“We had the opportunity to pilot some other AI solutions in the market, and found that the improvement over traditional search was limited - except in Blue J’s case, where the efficiency gain over traditional research methods is significant."

“We had the opportunity to pilot some other AI solutions in the market, and found that the improvement over traditional search was limited - except in Blue J’s case, where the efficiency gain over traditional research methods is significant."

Read More
David L. Phelps, Tax Director
Barnes Dennig
Mathew Talcoff

“Blue J is an exciting technology because it enables the practitioner to remain in the driver’s seat of the analysis."

"Thoughtful functions are included to encourage and facilitate deeper analysis, not to replace or reduce it. We’ll continue to find new and impactful ways to leverage the technology, which has benefited our clients and staff alike. At RSM we strive to be compelling to our clients and to be digital by embracing new technologies to fulfill that promise.”

"Thoughtful functions are included to encourage and facilitate deeper analysis, not to replace or reduce it. We’ll continue to find new and impactful ways to leverage the technology, which has benefited our clients and staff alike. At RSM we strive to be compelling to our clients and to be digital by embracing new technologies to fulfill that promise.”

Read More
Mathew Talcoff, Partner and Washington National Tax Leader
RSM US
Tanya Silves

"We wanted to have a tool that people were using at all staff levels."

"We wanted something that lived up on their third screen - something that would be available and helpful to them every day. What we've found is it's been easy to get people to get into the habit of using Blue J because it helps people. Blue J allows us to quickly respond to client questions in a way that they can understand it, which helps us deal with the volume of client questions that come in. We were up and running very quickly with Blue J - within 5 minutes, our staff understood how this will be helpful, and the rest of the training program is refining prompting skills and building use cases and best practices."

"We wanted something that lived up on their third screen - something that would be available and helpful to them every day. What we've found is it's been easy to get people to get into the habit of using Blue J because it helps people. Blue J allows us to quickly respond to client questions in a way that they can understand it, which helps us deal with the volume of client questions that come in. We were up and running very quickly with Blue J - within 5 minutes, our staff understood how this will be helpful, and the rest of the training program is refining prompting skills and building use cases and best practices."

Read More
Tanya Silves, Partner & Tax Director
Larson Gross

Ready to Transform Your Tax Research?

Join thousands of tax professionals who save hours every week with our AI-powered research.