What common mistakes should taxpayers avoid when claiming the Section 199A deduction?
Ask Blue J any tax question, then go deeper. Follow up, add client-specific context, and explore the sources behind every answer with Blue J’s generative AI solution for tax research.
When claiming the Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction, taxpayers should be aware of several common mistakes that can lead to incorrect deductions, IRS scrutiny, or even penalties. Below is a detailed analysis of the most frequent errors and the legal nuances behind them, with references to the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations, and authoritative commentary.
1. Misidentifying a Qualified Trade or Business
Mistake: Treating an ineligible business as a qualified trade or business (QTB).
- Legal Detail: Section 199A allows the deduction only for income from a QTB, which is any trade or business other than a C corporation, the trade or business of performing services as an employee, or a "specified service trade or business" (SSTB) for taxpayers above certain income thresholds.
- Nuance: SSTBs include fields such as health, law, accounting, consulting, athletics, financial services, and any business where the principal asset is the reputation or skill of one or more employees or owners. The definition is complex and can be misapplied, especially regarding the "reputation or skill" clause, which is fact-intensive and not always clear.
- Example: A business that is primarily a consulting firm, or a law practice, is an SSTB and may be ineligible for the deduction if the taxpayer’s income exceeds the phase-out range.
2. Incorrectly Calculating Qualified Business Income
Mistake: Including non-QBI items in the calculation.
- Legal Detail: QBI is the net amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss with respect to a QTB, but specifically excludes:
- Capital gains and losses
- Dividends
- Interest income not allocable to a trade or business
- Reasonable compensation paid to S corporation shareholders
- Guaranteed payments to partners
- Certain other investment-related items;.
- Nuance: Including these excluded items will overstate QBI and the deduction. For example, S corporation shareholders often mistakenly include their own W-2 wages in QBI, which is not permitted.
3. Ignoring the W-2 Wage and Qualified Property Limitations
Mistake: Failing to apply the wage and property limitations when required.
- Legal Detail: For taxpayers with taxable income above the threshold ($394,600 MFJ; $197,300 single for 2025), the deduction is limited to the greater of:
- 50% of W-2 wages paid by the business, or
- 25% of W-2 wages plus 2.5% of the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of all qualified property;.
- Nuance: Taxpayers below the threshold can ignore these limits, but those above must apply them. Errors often occur when taxpayers with high income fail to apply these limitations, especially in rental real estate activities with little or no W-2 wages.
4. Mishandling Losses and Carryforwards
Mistake: Not properly netting QBI losses or carrying forward losses.
- Legal Detail: If the net QBI from all QTBs is negative, the loss is carried forward to offset QBI in future years. The deduction in a subsequent year must be reduced by 20% of any carryover loss.
- Nuance: Failing to track and apply these carryforwards can result in an overstated deduction.
5. Improper Aggregation of Businesses
Mistake: Aggregating businesses that do not meet the regulatory requirements, or failing to aggregate when beneficial.
- Legal Detail: Taxpayers may aggregate multiple trades or businesses for Section 199A purposes only if they meet strict requirements, including common ownership, similar products/services, shared facilities, or operational interdependence, and none are SSTBs.
- Nuance: Improper aggregation can distort the calculation of QBI, W-2 wages, and UBIA, leading to an incorrect deduction. Conversely, failing to aggregate when eligible may result in a lower deduction.
6. Misapplying the SSTB Income Thresholds and Phase-Outs
Mistake: Not applying the SSTB exclusion or phase-out correctly.
- Legal Detail: For taxpayers with taxable income below the threshold, SSTBs are treated as QTBs. For those above the phase-in range, no deduction is allowed for SSTB income. Within the phase-in range, only a portion of SSTB income is eligible.
- Nuance: Errors often occur in the calculation of the "applicable percentage" of SSTB income that is eligible for the deduction within the phase-in range.
7. Failing to Exclude Employee Income
Mistake: Attempting to claim the deduction on employee wages.
- Legal Detail: Section 199A specifically excludes the trade or business of performing services as an employee from QBI eligibility.
- Nuance: Some taxpayers attempt to reclassify themselves as independent contractors to claim the deduction, but the IRS applies strict worker classification rules and may recharacterize the relationship.
8. Not Applying the Overall Taxable Income Limitation
Mistake: Failing to apply the overall limitation that the deduction cannot exceed 20% of taxable income (less net capital gain).
- Legal Detail: The deduction is limited to 20% of taxable income minus net capital gain;.
- Nuance: If taxable income (after net capital gain) is less than QBI, the deduction is limited accordingly.
9. Improper Treatment of Rental Real Estate
Mistake: Treating all rental activities as QTBs without analysis.
- Legal Detail: Only rental activities that rise to the level of a Section 162 trade or business qualify, unless the safe harbor for rental real estate is met.
- Nuance: Passive or triple-net lease arrangements may not qualify unless the safe harbor is satisfied or the activity otherwise meets the trade or business standard.
10. Inadequate Documentation and Disclosure
Mistake: Failing to maintain or provide required documentation, especially for aggregation or for substantiating QBI, W-2 wages, and UBIA.
- Legal Detail: Taxpayers must attach statements to their returns when aggregating businesses and must maintain records substantiating all elements of the deduction.
- Nuance: Failure to comply can result in the IRS disaggregating businesses or denying the deduction.
11. Underestimating the Substantial Understatement Penalty
Mistake: Not recognizing the lower threshold for the accuracy-related penalty.
- Legal Detail: For any return claiming the Section 199A deduction, the threshold for a substantial understatement of tax is reduced from 10% to 5% of the tax required to be shown on the return (or $5,000).
- Nuance: This increases the risk of penalties for errors, even if unrelated to the Section 199A deduction.
12. Improper Allocation Among Owners
Mistake: Not allocating QBI, W-2 wages, and UBIA among partners or shareholders according to the rules.
- Legal Detail: S corporation shareholders and partners must use their allocable share of QBI, W-2 wages, and UBIA, based on the partnership or S corporation’s allocation methods.
- Nuance: Special allocations or errors in allocation can lead to incorrect deductions.
13. Summary Table of Key Mistakes
14. Conclusion
Taxpayers should carefully review the Section 199A rules, ensure proper classification of their business, accurately calculate QBI, apply all relevant limitations, and maintain thorough documentation. Given the complexity and the lower penalty threshold, consulting a qualified tax professional is highly recommended when claiming the Section 199A deduction;;.
Was this answer helpful?
What Blue J customers are saying
“We are excited to use Blue J to elevate the initial work product our team is able to produce."
"We’re incorporating Blue J to ensure our people are well-equipped with a research tool that delivers on both ease of use and quality of deliverable. It will save us a lot of time as a starting point, so we can focus our efforts on the analysis. Ultimately, it helps us get to the right answer, faster.”
"We’re incorporating Blue J to ensure our people are well-equipped with a research tool that delivers on both ease of use and quality of deliverable. It will save us a lot of time as a starting point, so we can focus our efforts on the analysis. Ultimately, it helps us get to the right answer, faster.”
"We had used Checkpoint for a long time but found it wasn’t particularly well-used in our practice."
"A lot of our practitioners would have to turn to Google to find what they were looking for, which of course isn’t ideal. Blue J is a real game-changer when it comes to this, since it combines the efficiency of Google with the authoritative tax materials our people really need to serve their clients best. At ELO, we pride ourselves on providing services that are focused on value for clients and exceeding their expectations. Adding Blue J to our toolbox will enable us to do just that, as we continue to evolve our service offerings to better serve our clients’ needs.”
"A lot of our practitioners would have to turn to Google to find what they were looking for, which of course isn’t ideal. Blue J is a real game-changer when it comes to this, since it combines the efficiency of Google with the authoritative tax materials our people really need to serve their clients best. At ELO, we pride ourselves on providing services that are focused on value for clients and exceeding their expectations. Adding Blue J to our toolbox will enable us to do just that, as we continue to evolve our service offerings to better serve our clients’ needs.”
"We find this tool to be a game-changer for us and our clients.”
“We had the opportunity to pilot some other AI solutions in the market, and found that the improvement over traditional search was limited - except in Blue J’s case, where the efficiency gain over traditional research methods is significant."
“We had the opportunity to pilot some other AI solutions in the market, and found that the improvement over traditional search was limited - except in Blue J’s case, where the efficiency gain over traditional research methods is significant."
“Blue J is an exciting technology because it enables the practitioner to remain in the driver’s seat of the analysis."
"Thoughtful functions are included to encourage and facilitate deeper analysis, not to replace or reduce it. We’ll continue to find new and impactful ways to leverage the technology, which has benefited our clients and staff alike. At RSM we strive to be compelling to our clients and to be digital by embracing new technologies to fulfill that promise.”
"Thoughtful functions are included to encourage and facilitate deeper analysis, not to replace or reduce it. We’ll continue to find new and impactful ways to leverage the technology, which has benefited our clients and staff alike. At RSM we strive to be compelling to our clients and to be digital by embracing new technologies to fulfill that promise.”
"We wanted to have a tool that people were using at all staff levels."
"We wanted something that lived up on their third screen - something that would be available and helpful to them every day. What we've found is it's been easy to get people to get into the habit of using Blue J because it helps people. Blue J allows us to quickly respond to client questions in a way that they can understand it, which helps us deal with the volume of client questions that come in. We were up and running very quickly with Blue J - within 5 minutes, our staff understood how this will be helpful, and the rest of the training program is refining prompting skills and building use cases and best practices."
"We wanted something that lived up on their third screen - something that would be available and helpful to them every day. What we've found is it's been easy to get people to get into the habit of using Blue J because it helps people. Blue J allows us to quickly respond to client questions in a way that they can understand it, which helps us deal with the volume of client questions that come in. We were up and running very quickly with Blue J - within 5 minutes, our staff understood how this will be helpful, and the rest of the training program is refining prompting skills and building use cases and best practices."
