< Finsweet Attributes >
Business taxation

How are Section 179 limitations allocated for a C Corporation that was a member of a brother-sister controlled group for only part of the 2025 fiscal year?

Last updated: 
Sep 2025
Blue J Answer
Blue J leverages the latest large language models and a vast and authoritative tax database to answer tax questions. The information provided does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Generative AI systems can make mistakes. Verify all important information.
Better Tax Answers For All Your Tax Questions

Ask Blue J any tax question, then go deeper. Follow up, add client-specific context, and explore the sources behind every answer with Blue J’s generative AI solution for tax research.

Table of Contents
Answer

For a C Corporation that was a member of a brother-sister controlled group for only part of the 2025 fiscal year, the allocation of Section 179 limitations is governed by a combination of Internal Revenue Code provisions, Treasury Regulations, and IRS guidance. Here is a comprehensive explanation of how the Section 179 limitations are allocated in this scenario:

1. Definition of a Controlled Group for Section 179 Purposes

  • For Section 179, a "controlled group" is defined by reference to IRC §1563(a), but with a 50% stock ownership test instead of the usual 80% test.
  • This means that two or more corporations are considered a controlled group for Section 179 purposes if the same five or fewer persons own more than 50% of the total combined voting power or value of each corporation.

2. Component Member Status and the Dec. 31 Test

  • The allocation of Section 179 limitations is based on the group’s composition as of December 31 of the calendar year that falls within the corporation’s tax year.
  • A corporation is a "component member" of a controlled group for a tax year if it is a member of the group on December 31 and is not an excluded member, or if it is not a member on December 31 but was a member for at least half of the days in its tax year preceding December 31 (an "additional member");.

3. Section 179 Limitation Must Be Shared

  • The Section 179 dollar limitation (for 2025, $2,500,000) and the phase-out threshold ($4,000,000) must be apportioned among all component members of the controlled group as if the group were a single taxpayer.
  • The taxable income limitation is also applied to the group as a whole, not to each member separately.

4. Allocation Method and Apportionment Plan

  • The group may apportion the Section 179 limitation in any manner it chooses, provided all component members consent in writing to the apportionment plan (typically by filing IRS Form 1120, Schedule O, with their returns).
  • If no apportionment plan is adopted, the limitation is divided equally among all component members.

5. Corporation a Member for Only Part of the Year

  • If a corporation is a member of the controlled group for only part of its tax year, its status as a component member is determined as of December 31.
  • If it is a member on December 31 and not an excluded member, it is a component member for the entire tax year and must share the Section 179 limitation for that year.
  • If it is not a member on December 31, but was a member for at least half of the days in its tax year preceding December 31, it is treated as an "additional member" and must also share the limitation;.

Example: If a C Corporation with a calendar year is a member of a brother-sister controlled group from January 1 to July 1, 2025, but not on December 31, it will only be a component member if it was a member for at least half of the days in its tax year before December 31 (i.e., at least 183 days). If so, it is an "additional member" and must share the Section 179 limitation for the year. If not, it is not a component member and is not required to share the limitation.

6. Practical Steps for Allocation

  • Determine component member status as of December 31 (or as an additional member).
  • Calculate the group’s total Section 179 limitation (for 2025, $2,500,000, reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount by which the cost of Section 179 property placed in service exceeds $4,000,000).
  • File an apportionment plan (Schedule O) with each member’s return if the group wishes to allocate the limitation unequally.
  • If no plan is filed, divide the limitation equally among all component members.
  • Each member’s Section 179 deduction cannot exceed the cost of Section 179 property it placed in service during the year.

7. Special Notes

  • Property purchased from another group member does not qualify for Section 179.
  • If a consolidated return is filed for all component members, the allocation may not be revoked after the due date (including extensions) of the common parent’s return on which the Section 179 election is made.

8. Summary Table

Corporation’s Status on Dec. 31Member for ≥ Half of Year?Must Share Section 179 Limitation?
MemberN/AYes
Not a memberYesYes (as "additional member")
Not a memberNoNo

In summary: A C Corporation that was a member of a brother-sister controlled group for only part of the 2025 fiscal year must share the Section 179 limitation with the other component members if it is a member on December 31 or was a member for at least half of its tax year before December 31. The limitation is apportioned among all component members, either equally or according to a filed apportionment plan. If the corporation is not a component member under these rules, it is not required to share the limitation for that year.

Table of Contents

Was this answer helpful?

Go beyond the search box and discover how Blue J makes tax research as quick and easy as asking a colleague.

What Tax Professionals Are Saying

"Blue J is already delivering great results. We are excited to partner with Blue J on this initiative."

Sarah Chen
Senior Tax Manager
Regional Accounting Firm
$37,000+ in tax savings found

“Blue J will expand our generative AI capabilities to give our team members access to high-quality, quickly accessible data and effective research tooling, which, when coupled with their own personal expertise and experience, will unlock new insights with seamless efficiency. Our teams will tap Ask Blue J to discover the best tax law and insights to apply to their clients' individual situations, and in so doing, will enhance their own expertise. We view this collaboration as a win for both our clients and our people."

Sarah Chen
Senior Tax Manager
Regional Accounting Firm
$37,000+ in tax savings found

What Blue J customers are saying

Darin K. Seal

“We are excited to use Blue J to elevate the initial work product our team is able to produce."

"We’re incorporating Blue J to ensure our people are well-equipped with a research tool that delivers on both ease of use and quality of deliverable. It will save us a lot of time as a starting point, so we can focus our efforts on the analysis. Ultimately, it helps us get to the right answer, faster.”

"We’re incorporating Blue J to ensure our people are well-equipped with a research tool that delivers on both ease of use and quality of deliverable. It will save us a lot of time as a starting point, so we can focus our efforts on the analysis. Ultimately, it helps us get to the right answer, faster.”

Read More
Darin K. Seal, Partner In Charge of the Tax Department
HMV CPAs
Matt Mueller

"We had used Checkpoint for a long time but found it wasn’t particularly well-used in our practice."

"A lot of our practitioners would have to turn to Google to find what they were looking for, which of course isn’t ideal. Blue J is a real game-changer when it comes to this, since it combines the efficiency of Google with the authoritative tax materials our people really need to serve their clients best. At ELO, we pride ourselves on providing services that are focused on value for clients and exceeding their expectations. Adding Blue J to our toolbox will enable us to do just that, as we continue to evolve our service offerings to better serve our clients’ needs.”

"A lot of our practitioners would have to turn to Google to find what they were looking for, which of course isn’t ideal. Blue J is a real game-changer when it comes to this, since it combines the efficiency of Google with the authoritative tax materials our people really need to serve their clients best. At ELO, we pride ourselves on providing services that are focused on value for clients and exceeding their expectations. Adding Blue J to our toolbox will enable us to do just that, as we continue to evolve our service offerings to better serve our clients’ needs.”

Read More
Matt Mueller, Partner and Tax Practice Leader
ELO CPAs
David L. Phelps

"We find this tool to be a game-changer for us and our clients.”

“We had the opportunity to pilot some other AI solutions in the market, and found that the improvement over traditional search was limited - except in Blue J’s case, where the efficiency gain over traditional research methods is significant."

“We had the opportunity to pilot some other AI solutions in the market, and found that the improvement over traditional search was limited - except in Blue J’s case, where the efficiency gain over traditional research methods is significant."

Read More
David L. Phelps, Tax Director
Barnes Dennig
Mathew Talcoff

“Blue J is an exciting technology because it enables the practitioner to remain in the driver’s seat of the analysis."

"Thoughtful functions are included to encourage and facilitate deeper analysis, not to replace or reduce it. We’ll continue to find new and impactful ways to leverage the technology, which has benefited our clients and staff alike. At RSM we strive to be compelling to our clients and to be digital by embracing new technologies to fulfill that promise.”

"Thoughtful functions are included to encourage and facilitate deeper analysis, not to replace or reduce it. We’ll continue to find new and impactful ways to leverage the technology, which has benefited our clients and staff alike. At RSM we strive to be compelling to our clients and to be digital by embracing new technologies to fulfill that promise.”

Read More
Mathew Talcoff, Partner and Washington National Tax Leader
RSM US
Tanya Silves

"We wanted to have a tool that people were using at all staff levels."

"We wanted something that lived up on their third screen - something that would be available and helpful to them every day. What we've found is it's been easy to get people to get into the habit of using Blue J because it helps people. Blue J allows us to quickly respond to client questions in a way that they can understand it, which helps us deal with the volume of client questions that come in. We were up and running very quickly with Blue J - within 5 minutes, our staff understood how this will be helpful, and the rest of the training program is refining prompting skills and building use cases and best practices."

"We wanted something that lived up on their third screen - something that would be available and helpful to them every day. What we've found is it's been easy to get people to get into the habit of using Blue J because it helps people. Blue J allows us to quickly respond to client questions in a way that they can understand it, which helps us deal with the volume of client questions that come in. We were up and running very quickly with Blue J - within 5 minutes, our staff understood how this will be helpful, and the rest of the training program is refining prompting skills and building use cases and best practices."

Read More
Tanya Silves, Partner & Tax Director
Larson Gross

Ready to Transform Your Tax Research?

Join thousands of tax professionals who save hours every week with our AI-powered research.